|
Howe Barnes Investments, Inc. |
Peteris R. Abuls
First Vice President
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Richard A. Bone, CFP
First Vice President |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
James A. Eller First Vice President |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Anne E. Carmichael First Vice President |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Private Client Services |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
J a n u a r y 2 0 0 3
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Hindsight is 20/20
�We
don�t know what we don�t know.�
Hindsight is the purveyor of truth in
this statement. In a recent Barron�s article a review of stock
market forecasts by Wall Street�s brightest (or maybe most recognizable)
minds for 2002 revealed most prognosticators were far off the mark.
The average guesstimate was off by over 20%, as most predicted some
modest (some more than modest) rise in the market�s averages.
With the benefit of hindsight, we now
know the markets performed as follows:
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
The markets were indiscriminate in
taking away value in their choice of asset classes and individual
securities. The market sell-offs in July and September were quick
and broad-based.
Many of our recommended managers
entered the third quarter of 2002 with above average cash levels;
i.e.15-30% of portfolio values. Subsequent to September�s decline
these mangers added significantly to their stock portfolios leaving them
with only average cash balances at year-end. We were pleased to see
manger buying in the fourth quarter. The markets tend to be
irrational in their extreme moments, and these extremes create opportunity
for those with the insight, financial flexibility and patience to allow
the situation to unfold.
Buying at the distressed levels of
September/October proved prescient. The markets rallied during the
fourth quarter providing the following gains in the broad-based
averages: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
There is an old saying in the
forecasting business. �Give them a number but don�t give them a
date�, or �Give them a date but don�t give them a number!� The
investment game, and life for that matter, is more about probabilities
than precision or perfection. �The odds are in your favor.�, �There
is a better chance than not.�, �There is a better chance of finding a
needle in a haystack�� are everyday references to the chances life
entails.
In our investment committee meeting in
mid October, a question was presented to the group. The question was
�What were the probabilities that our equity portfolios would produce
positive returns in the ensuing 15 months?� The average of our
bright, but not so famous group was 85%. For an otherwise pretty realistic
group, this was a bullish sentiment. As a frame of reference, since 1926
on a calendar basis the markets have been positive 70% of the time.
We considered the September decline as
a buying opportunity. That is to say we believed the markets were
within 85% to 90% of their bottoms, assuming a �somewhat� efficient or
�somewhat� rational market. Part of this analysis was based on
fundamentals, part on long-term growth averages and part on the pervasive
risk sentiment in the markets. Though we are not convinced a great
many investors understand risk, the prevalence of the �awareness� of risk
was at levels we have not seen in the better part of 20 years.
Investment opportunity and the perception of risk are most often
positively correlated. When the perception of risk is highest
(actual risk is at its lowest) investment opportunity is at its highest
(investment prices are at their lowest.)
The professionals at Harris Associates
recently reminded shareholders that Warren Buffet in 1999 stated in a
Fortune article that the returns for stocks for the next 17 years would be
6%. This was at the height of the market bubble. Prices were
their highest and risk perception was at its lowest. Because returns for the 17
years leading up to 1999 had averaged 19%, Buffet was temporarily exiled
to the Rest Home for Old Economy Thinkers.
Three years later the S&P 500 and
the Nasdaq have lost 40% and 70% of their respective values! Prices
are significantly lower and yet the risk perception is much higher!
Assuming Mr. Buffet was right in 1999 about 6% annualized returns
through 2016, the market will have to average approximately 11% from this
point forward to average 6%.
The fixed income markets and the
economy were benefactors of an additional aggressive easing from the
Federal Reserve. The cut in short-term rates was from 1.75% to
1.25%. The easing was in response to the deflationary pressures that
continue to linger and an additional shot of adrenaline for an economy
that is grinding its way through recession-like conditions. The
stock markets began trending up swiftly on the rhetoric preceding the cut.
In the fixed income markets high yield securities rallied on the
rhetoric of rate cuts as well. The price of the Pimco High Yield
Fund went from a low of $7.74 on October 10 to $8.52 on December 31.
This was a rise of 10.10% on NAV (exclusive of dividends received
for October, November and December.) The bond market is forecasting
an improving credit scenario for fixed income markets and an improving
economy with this action.
A general consensus prevails that we
may have seen the bottom in interest rates. High yield securities
have moved up in price, mortgage rates are up off their lows and the yield
spread between treasuries and lower grade bonds has narrowed. It is
a great time to be a long-term borrower. If it is a great time to be
a borrower, what does that mean about the prospects for being a long-term
lender? We would suggest, �Long-term Lender Beware!�
As we close 2002 with a third
consecutive year of equity market losses we are reminded of a recent quip
from Art Cashen, a floor trader often seen on CNBC. Art is the
author (or at least mouthpiece) for such notables as �Why martinis are
like Federal Reserve rate cuts.� In a discussion on seasonally
adjusted unemployment numbers, Art reminded us that December could very
well be the warmest month of the year, on a seasonally adjusted basis.
Or said another way, December on a relative basis was the warmest
month of the year. Yet during the month of December the only people
swimming in Lake Michigan were members of The Polar Bear Club!
Likewise, over the last three years we
have spoken many times about the relative performance of your accounts.
Trust us, we do understand that relative performance doesn�t
necessarily equate to larger checks to be cashed at the bank.
However, we do believe our clients have more absolute dollars
available today than if they were in an index portfolio, a large cap
growth portfolio, one of any number of company-owned stock plans or a host
of many other possibilities. It is our belief that from this point,
this larger residual capital base will make the likelihood of you
achieving your long-term financial goals greater. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
The opinions expressed in this report
are those of the author and are not necessarily the same as Howe Barnes
Investments or its research department. The contents of this letter
have been compiled from original and published sources believed to be
reliable, but are not guaranteed as to accuracy or completeness.
Howe Barnes and/or its affiliates may have an interest in, or from
time to time trade or make markets in, the securities of issues discussed
herein.
Member of New York Stock Exchange
Member Securities Investor Protection
Corporation
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||